
Now that I finally have all of the images posted, and rearranged a bit, you can see all of them here. The new ones are the Feb. 20 and 22 performances. And there seems to be an issue with some browsers and linking directly to specific images at the moment, so direct links to images aren’t working . . . sorry.

By popular demand (and popular demand just means more than three here at Vindauga). . . here are my shots from the parade yesterday. Continue reading ‘St. Pat’s 2008′

I was very excited about this image when I first showed it to Jerri for her opinion (an essential part of my process, despite the fact that I don’t always listen). She told me she liked it, and then . . . “people will probably just think you did it digitally though.” Thus one of the most under-reported problems with the age of digital imaging rears its ugly head again. You can be Jerry Ulesman in the darkroom, and if you do something absolutely amazing, but it looks like something that could have been done in photoshop, no one cares. (I am not trying to imply my image is amazing.) The default has become assuming the image is altered; if it looks too anything to be true, assume photoshop. Continue reading ‘New Ideas, or Re-working Old Ideas’